Erdős Number

While I’m not strictly speaking a mathematician, I always wondered what my Erdős Number would be. The Erdős calculated of an author is calculated the following way: Paul Erdős has number 0, people who have coauthored a paper with him have a number 1, people who co-write papers with people with a number of 1 have a number of 2, etc.
So I took advantage of this snowy Sunday to search for a path between Paul Erdős and myself. If you have published mathematical papers, you just need to search for yourself on the collaboration distance tool. But as I have not published any mathematical paper, I had to try out the various people I cowrote papers with, and see what would come out. I then had to look for the people they co-wrote with to find a better path. I found the following four step path:

  1. Paul Erdős → Stanley M. Selkow: Random graph isomorphism.
  2. Stanley M. Selkow → Giovanni Coray: Order independence in local clustering algorithms.
  3. Giovanni Coray → André Schiper: Une structure de contrôle à deux niveaux pour la programmation heuristique parallèle.
  4. André Schiper → Matthias Wiesmann: Beyond 1-safety and 2-safety for replicated databases: Group-safety

The first five step path I had found was the following:

  1. Paul Erdős → Shmuel Zaks: Minimum-diameter cyclic arrangements in mapping data-flow graphs onto VLSI arrays
  2. Shmuel Zaks → Gerard Tel: Optimal synchronization of ABD networks
  3. Gerard Tel → Bernadette Charron-Bost: Synchronous, asynchronous, and causally ordered communication
  4. Bernadette Charron-Bost → André Schiper: Uniform consensus is harder than consensus
  5. André Schiper → Matthias Wiesmann: Beyond 1-safety and 2-safety for replicated databases: Group-safety

But there is at least another 5 step possibility:

  1. Paul Erdős → Ronald L. Graham: On sums of Fibonnaci numbers.
  2. Ronald L. Graham → John L. Bruno: Computer and job-shop scheduling theory.
  3. John L. Bruno → Divyakant Agrawal: Relative serializability: an approach for relaxing the atomicity of transactions.
  4. Divyakant Agrawal → Gustavo Alonso: Advanced Transaction Models in Workflow Contexts.
  5. Gustavo Alonso → Matthias Wiesmann: Understanding replication in databases and distributed systems.

I also found two different path of length 6:

  1. Paul Erdős → Fan Chung: On the product of the point and line covering numbers of a graph
  2. Fan Chung → Patrick Solé: Patrick Multidiameters and multiplicities
  3. Patrick Solé → Peter J. Olver: Generalized transvectants and Siegel modular forms
  4. Peter J. Olver → Metin Arık: Multi-Hamiltonian structure of the Born-Infeld equation
  5. Metin Arık → Gökhan Ünel: q-oscillators, the q-epsilon tensor and quantum groups
  6. Gökhan Ünel → Matthias Wiesmann: Deployment and use of the ATLAS DAQ in the combined test beam
  1. Paul Erdős → Alexander Rosa: Decompositions of complete graphs into factors with diameter two.
  2. Alexander Rosa → Jean-Claude Bermond: Decomposition of complete graphs into isomorphic subgraphs with five vertices.
  3. Jean-Claude Bermond → Michel Raynal: General and efficient decentralized consensus protocols.
  4. Michel Raynal → Maria Gradinariu: Stabilizing mobile philosophers.
  5. Maria Gradinariu → Xavier Défago: Fault-tolerant and self-stabilizing mobile robots gathering – feasibility study.
  6. Xavier Défago → Matthias Wiesmann: Anonymous stabilizing leader election using a network sequencer.

Comments (3)

JanusMonday 2 February 2009 at 09:51

It seems That’s just a specialization of the six degree of separation concept / theory:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_degrees_of_separation

AliasMonday 2 February 2009 at 10:15

It’s the Kevin Bacon Index for mathematicians. :)

Patrick SoleMonday 19 October 2009 at 15:18

What about fractional erdoes number? Like dividing by the number of disjoint paths to Erdoes? My frac EN is one i think..

Leave a comment

Your comment

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree